Da 2166 9 1 PDF Form

When filling out the DA 2166-9-1 form, it’s essential to approach the task with care. This form plays a crucial role in evaluating the performance of non-commissioned officers. Here are some important dos and don’ts to keep in mind:

• Do ensure all personal information is accurate. This includes the name, SSN, and rank.
• Do use clear and concise language when describing duties and responsibilities.
• Do verify that all signatures are obtained before submission. This includes the rater, senior rater, and supplementary reviewer if applicable.
• Do double-check the dates for accuracy, particularly the counseling dates and the dates of signatures.
• Don't leave any sections blank. If a section does not apply, indicate that appropriately.
• Don't rush through the form. Take your time to ensure all information is complete and correctly entered.

By following these guidelines, you can help ensure that the evaluation process goes smoothly and accurately reflects the performance of the rated NCO.

The DA Form 2166-9-1 is similar to the DA Form 67-9, which is the Officer Evaluation Report (OER). Both forms serve to evaluate the performance of military personnel, but they are tailored for different ranks. The OER is used for officers, while the DA Form 2166-9-1 is specifically for non-commissioned officers (NCOs). Each form includes sections for administrative data, performance evaluations, and signatures from raters and senior raters. The purpose of both documents is to provide a structured assessment of an individual's performance and potential, ensuring that evaluations are consistent and standardized across the military. 

Another similar document is the DA Form 1059, which is the Academic Evaluation Report (AER). This form is used to evaluate soldiers who complete formal training courses. Like the DA Form 2166-9-1, the AER includes sections for administrative data and evaluations of performance. Both forms aim to capture a soldier's competencies and skills, albeit in different contexts. While the DA Form 2166-9-1 focuses on overall job performance in a unit, the AER concentrates on academic achievements and training outcomes. 

The New York Lease Agreement is an essential legal document that establishes and formalizes the terms between landlords and tenants, ensuring clarity and minimizing potential conflicts. By detailing specific rights and responsibilities, both parties have a legally binding reference to uphold throughout the rental period. For those looking to access a New York Lease Agreement form, a resourceful option is found at legalformspdf.com, where you can obtain the necessary documentation to facilitate a smooth leasing process.

The DA Form 4856, known as the Developmental Counseling Form, also shares similarities with the DA Form 2166-9-1. This form is used for documenting counseling sessions between leaders and soldiers. Both forms emphasize the importance of feedback and development in a soldier's career. While the DA Form 2166-9-1 provides a formal evaluation of performance over a specific period, the DA Form 4856 is more focused on ongoing communication and guidance. Each document plays a role in the professional growth of military personnel. 

Lastly, the DA Form 7000, which is the Financial Liability Investigation of Property Loss (FLIPL), is another document that has some parallels. Although it deals with financial accountability rather than performance evaluation, both forms require detailed information and signatures from various parties. The DA Form 7000 assesses responsibility and liability, while the DA Form 2166-9-1 evaluates a soldier's performance and potential. Both documents are essential for maintaining standards and accountability within the military framework. 

Filling out the DA 2166-9-1 form can be a straightforward process, but many individuals make common mistakes that can lead to complications. One significant error is not providing complete and accurate administrative data in Part I. This section requires essential information such as the name, Social Security Number, and unit details. Omitting any of this information or making typographical errors can delay the evaluation process and create unnecessary confusion.

Another frequent mistake occurs in the performance evaluation section. Raters often fail to provide specific comments that adequately reflect the rated NCO's performance. Instead of vague statements, detailed observations about the NCO’s adherence to Army values and their professional attributes should be included. This not only helps in creating a fair assessment but also provides the rated NCO with valuable feedback for their growth.

Additionally, some individuals overlook the importance of signatures and dates in Part II. Both the rater and senior rater must sign and date the form to validate the evaluation. Failing to do so may lead to the form being considered incomplete, which can impact the NCO’s career progression. Ensuring that these sections are properly filled out is crucial for the legitimacy of the evaluation.

Lastly, many people neglect to review the entire form before submission. A final check can catch errors or omissions that might have been missed during the initial filling out process. Taking a moment to review the completed form can save time and prevent potential issues in the future. By being mindful of these common mistakes, individuals can improve the accuracy and effectiveness of the DA 2166-9-1 form.

Understanding the DA 2166-9-1 form is essential for non-commissioned officers (NCOs) in the U.S. Army. However, several misconceptions can lead to confusion. Below are four common misconceptions about this form, along with clarifications to help ensure accurate understanding.

• Misconception 1: The form is only for negative evaluations.

Many believe that the DA 2166-9-1 form is solely used to document poor performance. In reality, this form serves to evaluate both strengths and areas for improvement. It provides a comprehensive view of an NCO's performance, highlighting achievements as well as developmental needs.

• Misconception 2: Signing the form means agreement with the evaluation.

Some NCOs think that their signature on the form indicates agreement with the rater's assessment. However, the signature merely confirms that the NCO has reviewed the report and that the administrative data is accurate. It does not imply acceptance of the evaluation itself.

• Misconception 3: The form is not important for career advancement.

It is a common belief that the DA 2166-9-1 form does not significantly impact an NCO's career. On the contrary, this evaluation plays a crucial role in determining promotions and assignments. A well-documented evaluation can enhance an NCO's prospects for advancement within the Army.

• Misconception 4: Only the rater is responsible for the evaluation process.

Some individuals assume that the rater alone is accountable for the evaluation. In fact, the process involves multiple parties, including the senior rater and, in some cases, a supplementary reviewer. Each individual contributes to a balanced and fair assessment of the NCO’s performance.